logo
Google Reviews Logo

317.636.6481

One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Make a Payment
logo
CONTACT US
CALL US
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Pharmaceutical Drug & Medical Device Litigation
    • Personal Injury
    • Sexual Abuse
    • Class Action
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Eminent Domain
    • Family Law
    • Business Services, Real Estate & Business Litigation
    • Bankruptcy, Creditor’s Rights, & Commercial & Business Law
    • Appellate Law
  • Firm News
    • News & Announcements
    • Alerts
  • Resources
    • Video Library
    • Blog
  • Contact Us
Google Reviews Logo

317.636.6481

One Indiana Square, Suite 1400 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Make a Payment
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Pharmaceutical Drug & Medical Device Litigation
    • Personal Injury
    • Sexual Abuse
    • Class Action
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Eminent Domain
    • Family Law
    • Business Services, Real Estate & Business Litigation
    • Bankruptcy, Creditor’s Rights, & Commercial & Business Law
    • Appellate Law
  • Firm News
    • News & Announcements
    • Alerts
  • Resources
    • Video Library
    • Blog
  • Contact Us

Bounce House Injuries Send More Children to Emergency Room

by: Edward B. Mulligan V, Attorney

Child injuries associated with bounce houses and inflatable moonwalks are growing at an alarming rate. In 2010 alone, more than 11,000 children were rushed to anbounce house.jpg emergency room because of bounce house injuries. A recent study by American Academy of Pediatrics suggests inflatable bouncer-related injuries are growing at a faster rate than trampoline-related injuries, which have been thought to be one of the most dangerous pieces of recreational equipment for children. The report published in November 2012 is the first study of its kind to use nationally representative data regarding injury rates, types, and risk factors in assessing inflatable bouncer-related injuries.

What You Need to Know About Imported Food and the Food Safety Modernization Act

by: Jonathan Knoll, Attorney
In previous blog articles, you have had the opportunity to learn how the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) works to protect consumers from dangerous medical device FDA fruit.jpgand pharmaceutical products. But, did you know that the FDA’s focus is not only on protecting consumers from dangerous medical devices and drugs? In this article, I’ll discuss another area where the FDA works to protect consumers, that being in the area of food safety.

The Importance of Reporting Adverse Events to the FDA

We have previously discussed the role of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its oversight of medical device and pharmaceutical products. With so many stories in the news about food and drug dangers, consumers need to understand the function of the FDA and how it works to protect them.

Defective Medical Devices: Manufacturers, Physicians, and Fault

by: Gregory L. Laker , Attorney
Pharmaceuticals and medical devices have a huge impact on the health and quality of life for millions of people. Companies spend billions of dollars in research and development seeking to create the next blockbuster drug or groundbreaking medical device that will allow patients to live fuller, happier lives. A problem happens when thesedoctor xray.jpg companies choose profits ahead of people by allowing dangerous drugs and medical devices to be used in treatments.

What You Need to Know About Accessibility at Public Venues: Guest Post by Melissa Stuart

by: Melissa L.Stuart, Attorney
Summertime means more outdoor activities. For people with disabilities, it can be challenging to navigate outdoor venues and other public places due to accessibility issues. My article on the Friendship Circle blog this month discusses accessibility concerns and how the Americans with Disabilities Act protects the rights of people with disabilities.

Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Bartlett Decision Leaves Injured Consumers Without Protection

by: Jonathan Knoll, Attorney
Recently, in a divided 5-4 opinion, the United States Supreme Court dealt a crushing blow to victims of dangerous and defective drugs. In Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Bartlett, the Supreme Court found that state-law design defect claims against generic drug manufacturers that turn on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are pre-empted by federal law. In doing so, the Court extended its 2011 decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, which found that state-law failure to warn claims against generic manufacturers are pre-empted under federal law.

How to Manage Your Risk When Buying a Franchise

Deciding to start or purchase a business can be both scary and exciting. Aside from purchasing real estate, becoming a business owner may be one of the largest financial investments you may make. When you put your money, time, and effort into an investment like a business, it is important that you take appropriate steps to manage your risk. Hiring an attorney to advise you of legal rights and negotiate on your behalf can mitigate your investment risk and give you peace of mind.

Recent Supreme Court Decision Allows Corporations to Avoid Class Action Lawsuits, Insulate Themselves From Antitrust Liability, and Deny Their Victims Access to Legal Remedies

by: Scott D. Gilchrist, Attorney
     &nbspLynn A.Toops, Attorney
Yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 5-3 decision, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, that deals a crushing blow to all victims of corporate wrongdoing. Corporations of all types now routinely require customers to agree to form contracts that deny the customer access to the courts and eliminate the right to cooperate with other potential victims in bringing a class action lawsuit. In American Express Company v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the Supreme Court decided that under the Federal Arbitration Act such contracts should be enforced, even when the contract prevents the effective vindication of statutory rights, as long as the customer has a theoretical “right” to pursue a remedy through private arbitration.

Do I Need an Attorney for a Real Estate Transaction?

by: Richard M. Malad, Attorney
Typical real estate transactions involve a buyer, a seller, and real estate agents who represent each of the parties involved in the transfer of ownership of the property. Including an attorney in your real estate transaction can help either party ensure that their interests are being protected.
Day213 Blue Front DoorYou may be wondering why you would need to hire an attorney. Regardless of whether your transaction is typical or not,. An attorney can provide valuable assistance to make sure your interests are well represented in the transaction. Below are a few facets of the real estate transaction that an attorney can help you with.

Protecting Your Business with Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Provisions

by: Arend J. Abel, Attorney
Business owners invest a great deal of time and money in developing customer relationships. That investment can be placed at risk when key employees who have been servicing customers leave to work elsewhere. The valuable relationships theychess.jpg have built can easily be leveraged to move customers to the competition unless the business owner take appropriate measures to protect the business.
Similarly, a person buying an existing business is investing money to acquire the customer lists and relationships as well as inventory and product. Buyers can be placing their investment at risk if they allow the seller to remain free to re-start the business and compete for the seller’s former customers.

One Indiana Square Suite 1400
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Copyright ©  Cohen & Malad, LLP. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy

 

Ask about scheduling an initial free consultation today
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ask about scheduling an initial free consultation today

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.