• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Cohen & Malad, LLP

Giving Power to Your Voice for Over 50 Years

Google Reviews
866.446.7478317.636.6481
Make a Payment free consult

  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Services
    • Appellate Law
    • Business Services & Litigation
    • Class Action
    • Eminent Domain
    • Family Law
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury
    • Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Litigation
    • Real Estate Services & Litigation
    • Sexual Abuse
  • Testimonials
  • Resources
    • Alerts
    • Firm News
    • Video Library
    • Blog
    • FAQs
  • Contact

Home » Our Blog » When can a direct action be brought in the context of a closely held company?

When can a direct action be brought in the context of a closely held company?

By Cohen & Malad, LLP

By: Arend J. Abel, Attorney

On June 1, the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed the circumstances in which a shareholder in a closely held limited liability company could sue another shareholder for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of alleged mismanagement of the corporation.   Ordinarily, such actions must be brought derivatively, but the Court noted that Indiana law provides an exception in some circumstances.

Typically, a claim of corporate mismanagement involves harm to the corporation, and as such must be brought derivatively.  However, the policies requiring a derivative action are the protection of third party shareholders and creditors.  Under Barth v. Barth, 659 N.E.2d 559 (Ind. 1995), where those policies are not implicated, a derivative action is not required.

Thus, in  Bioconvergence, LLC v. Menefree, the Court of Appeals found that a direct action against a majority shareholder in a closely-held limited liability was permissible, or at least non-frivolous, because the only shareholder other than the plaintiff was the defendant, and there were no creditors.

A direct action by a shareholder against a fellow shareholder may be the only effective remedy for a minority shareholder in situations where a majority shareholder is either mismanaging a business or siphoning off funds.  A derivative action contains a number of procedural hurdles.  Importantly, with derivative actions, the corporation may take over a derivative action, form an independent litigation committee, and on the recommendation of that committee dismiss the action, leaving a minority shareholder without a remedy.

Primary Sidebar

ASK ABOUT SCHEDULING AN INITIAL FREE CONSULTATION TODAY

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Cohen & Malad, LLP

One Indiana Square Suite 1400
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
(317) 636-6481
Toll Free: (866) 446-7478

Copyright © 2023 Cohen & Malad, LLP
Disclaimer Privacy Policy

  • About Us
  • Attorneys
  • Services
    ▼
    • Appellate Law
    • Business Services & Litigation
    • Class Action
    • Eminent Domain
    • Family Law
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury
    • Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Litigation
    • Real Estate Services & Litigation
    • Sexual Abuse
  • Testimonials
  • Resources
    ▼
    • Alerts
    • Firm News
    • Video Library
    • Blog
    • FAQs
  • Contact